View Single Post
Old 02-24-2011, 10:25 AM   #16
Unicellular Fungi
TheLorax's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008

The whole point of it (again, not that I am defending or otherwise these companies) is they want to protect their technology from being "stolen" from them.
At what expense have we allowed the protection of multinational corporate profits? The patenting of life is so very wrong for so very many reasons. | Patenting Life
You, or someone you love, may die because of a gene patent that should never have been granted in the first place. Sound far-fetched? Unfortunately, it's only too real.
Gene patents are now used to halt research, prevent medical testing, and keep vital information from you and your doctor. Gene patents slow the pace of medical advance on deadly diseases. And they raise costs exorbitantly: a test for breast cancer that could be done for $1,000 now costs $3,000.
Why? Because the holder of the gene patent can charge whatever he wants, and does. Couldn't somebody make a cheaper test? Sure, but the patent holder blocks any competitor's test. He owns the gene. Nobody else can test for it. In fact, you can't even donate your own breast cancer gene to another scientist without permission. The gene may exist in your body, but it's now private property.
This bizarre situation has come to pass because of a mistake by an underfinanced and understaffed government agency. The United States Patent Office misinterpreted previous Supreme Court rulings and some years ago began—to the surprise of everyone, including scientists decoding the genome—to issue patents on genes.
Diamond v. Chakrabarty has resulted in monopolies exploiting the entire human race. Bioprospecting is now internationally sanctioned.

The patenting of life was not necessary for scientists to do meaningful research.
"In the end we will conserve only what we love; we will love only what we understand; we will understand only what we have been taught."
-Baba Dioum, Senegalese ecologist
TheLorax is offline   Reply With Quote